🔗 Share this article

Iturns out the manager could survive defeat by Grimsby. He weathered an important continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

For example, this was the director , after having been part of the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with full compensation, with no penalty clause activated. The director speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who privately has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many companies have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the strategy by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, yet ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or fails of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who hired him live to blunder another day.

A Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach and then dismiss him for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and then bin them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.